Sharks at the underdog price here is where we see value. the book marks this as a 58-42 split for TYLOO, but the best available price on Sharks sits longer than that fair line implies, giving us a confirmed positive edge from the sharpest book in the market. At a Major LAN with real preparation behind both sides, the book's number is the most reliable data point on the board today. The map pool case for Sharks is concrete. TYLOO have zero Dust2 maps played in the sample and no data on Anubis either, leaving their veto heavily reliant on Mirage (82% over 22 maps) and Inferno (75% over 16). Sharks meanwhile carry an 80% Anubis win rate over five maps and 69% on Nuke over 16, giving them two credible picks that TYLOO either can't ban away or lack the depth to contest. If Sharks force Anubis or Nuke into the series, they are playing on terrain where their win rates comfortably exceed 65%, while TYLOO's Ancient sits at just 47% over 19 maps as their weakest main surface. The public lean on TYLOO comes from their rank advantage at 29 versus Sharks at 35 and the optics of TYLOO's big Mirage and Inferno numbers. But in a full Bo3 with a contested veto, Sharks don't have to play on TYLOO's maps. Their recent LAN result against HEROIC on Nuke shows they can win individual maps against genuine top-30 opposition. This match is closer than the rank gap suggests, and the price reflects a wider gap than actually exists.